![]() Yes, it’s well designed ! However, it’s implementation lakes consistency and real portability. That’s true for abstraction layer, device probe, network, etc. This should mean use of each native OS specific models and structures, all of this abstracted using internals models and structures. However, portability does not mean integration anywhere with only generic code reduce to the least common denominator. You can scan from LibreOffice, using platform specific backends like TWAIN/SANE. SANe pretend to be very portable and it actually is. A bridge between OLE automation and UNO, so you can use UNO services. I would add another problem : misintegration in hosting OS. 86 Los Angeles Street Newton, MA 02458 P: 61 F. In order to use it with Image Capture, Ellert's FAQ page describes a procedure for selecting the twain sane interface GUI over the native GUI. The clients can reach other sane scanners over the network I was trying to help get documentation togeather to better support this scanner (I am actually writing out more user friendly guides for a few.), which is why I am involved at all.-Steven Santos Director Simply Circus, Inc. Since, all backends implements options with a lot of originality making frontend developer life a hell. I have downloaded and installed Mattius Ellert's twain sane interface in order to be able to use an old scanner. However, no update has been done since SANE standard 1.0 publication. That’s normal that SANE 1.0 did not provide all the recommandations for today scanners. However, these options are still declared with “high level” meta data such as title, description, etc. options are very primitive and not directly suitable for UI (see screenshot : for options for selecting scan area).After writing too SANE frontend (considering the entire gnome-scan rewrite for 0.6 release), i can say that SANE needs huge work for frontend developers, for various reasons : ![]() However, that’s quite obvious why they come to such result. I’m not critizing this because it’s proprietary, i bet even Google people behind that think the same. The overall UI is messy, inconsistent and unfriendly. I have to admit the scanner support is really rought and buggy (or quick and dirty if you mind).ĭevices option are dumped with one tab per option group. I guess they use an internal SANE/TWAIN bridge. This is amazing to see such compagny taking FOSS in account, trying to understand the way it works instead of trying to use Windows® methods on Libre systems.Īnyway, the key point about picasa is that scan feature. Apart from beeing just a wine linked software, thanks to Google for providing regular repository for tons of distros. If a user-specified barcode string is detected, the separator is saved to a new TIFF file, which is appended with all subsequent pages until a new separator is detected. Uses the LEADTOOLS barcode engine to search for Code128 barcodes on the pages. Most of you read the latest news about picasa for Linux. Scans pages from a TWAIN source and saves the acquired pages to multi-page TIFF files. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |